Depressing because parts of the world and of academia have focussed on the book’s flaws and remain deaf to its implicit message of tolerance of the importance of engaging seriously with one’s opponents of becoming aware of one’s own unexamined assumptions.īoswell has been criticized by both religious conservatives and traditionalist scholars as well as liberals and queer theorists.

Inspiring because of the book’s scope and ambition and the depth of Boswell’s erudition and insight. Revisiting Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality over a decade after I first read it, and three and a half decades after its publication, is both an inspiring and a depressing experience. I was stunned by this scholar who could command so many languages (17 by all accounts) who had, it seemed, read everything and had something stimulating to say about it who managed to combine brilliant scholarship with humanity and a sense of the relevance of medieval culture to the contemporary world. I began my undergraduate studies in the year after John Boswell’s untimely death, and came across his work towards the end of my doctoral research. We’d love to hear what Boswell’s book means to our readers so please continue the conversation in our comments section. This week on NOTCHES, we examine the Boswell legacy, asking three leading medievalists to evaluate the book’s significance today, more than three decades after its publication. Its impact was also felt outside the academy: a New York Times Book of the Year (1980) and winner of a National Book Award (1981), it attracted (and continues to attract) a wide non-specialist readership. Within academic circles, it provoked considerable debate, being subjected to fierce criticism even as it was adopted as one of the foundation texts of a new discipline. Since its publication in 1980, John Boswell’s Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality has dominated conversations about the history of sexuality.

Boswell christianity social tolerance